Introduction
There is increasing acknowledgement of the need for university students to develop knowledge and skills to work on societal and global problems that traditional disciplinary frameworks cannot effectively address (e.g., Biberhofer & Rammel, 2017). One response to this need is to stimulate the development of innovative inter- and transdisciplinary courses, which have challenges of their own. Understanding these challenges and the factors that support the success of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary educational innovation in the Netherlands can inform strategy for higher education policy, both locally and nationally, as Dutch universities make the transition to forms of education that prepare students for addressing the wicked problems of the 21st century.
Method
First, a literature overview including challenges and successes of inter- and transdisciplinary education was created. Themes were student perceptions, faculty perceptions, institutional embedding, and broader collaboration within and outside of the educational institutes. Secondly, the relevance of these themes where evaluated in a qualitative survey distributed among stakeholders (e.g., students, course designers and coordinators, and educational leaders) for inter- or transdisciplinary education at Dutch higher education institutes and associate societal partners. In addition, participants were asked to provide solutions for the challenges that they identified. In total, 41 surveys were completed, of which the majority were (among others) teaching inter- and/or transdisciplinary education.
Results
Of all survey participants, 31 participants reported on the challenges they identified, which were in subsequent order of frequency:
1. There is no financial embedding, making interdisciplinary/ transdisciplinary education financially unviable or unstable (67.7%).
2. There is no stability in staff who are assigned to the courses and will continue participation (54,8%).
3. The collaboration between programs and departments within higher education institutes is lacking or too difficult to set-up or maintain (48,4%).
4. Staff lacks the knowledge and skills to engage in interdisciplinary/ transdisciplinary education (48,4%).
5. The collaboration between higher education institutes and external partners is lacking or too difficult to set-up or maintain (35.5%).
6. Lecturers and program directors don't see the value of interdisciplinary/ transdisciplinary education, or don't want to spend money on it (29,0%).
7. Students don't see the value for their professional and career development (19,4%).
Solutions lie according to the participants in expectation management and training and supporting staff in their inter- and transdisciplinary teaching skills development.
Conclusion and discussion
University staff recognize many of the challenges presented in the literature and their suggestions are translated into concrete advice to support the long-term viability of inter- and transdisciplinary courses. For universities, this could result in a better return on investment as development costs are high. The benefits for students include lasting inter- and transdisciplinary education, which will support them in their professional development. The next step is to add in-depth interviews with stakeholders to make the advice even more concrete and usable for other universities as well.
Reference
Biberhofer, P. and Rammel, C. (2017). Transdisciplinary learning and teaching as answers to urban sustainability challenges. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 18(1): 63-83, doi: 10.1108/IJSHE-04-2015-0078.