Conference Agenda

Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).

Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 18th Oct 2024, 10:06:55am BST

 
Only Sessions at Location/Venue 
 
 
Session Overview
Session
Session 21: Methodology & Meaning
Time:
Monday, 17/June/2024:
3:30pm - 5:00pm

Session Chair: Jacob Johanssen
Location: F6
External Resource for This Session


Show help for 'Increase or decrease the abstract text size'
Presentations
ID: 179
Individual Paper

Towards a Schizoid Methodology

Cosima Cobley Carr

N/A, United Kingdom

Using practice-based research this paper explores the potential for a schizoid methodology. Starting from the assumption that philosophy and other theoretical work within the psychosocial sphere constitute practices, this research uses artistic practice as a technique to avoid the tendency towards universalism common in post-Enlightenment theoretical discourses. Through collage work, this paper asks the question: what would a schizoid methodology look like? This comes with an array of problems and questions due to the divergences in conceptualisations of schizoid states through the history of psychoanalysis. However, whilst an exacting schizoid methodology may not be achievable due to these differences, this explorative research offers new ideas for practice that can be returned to theoretical modes.



ID: 198
Individual Paper

Creating a Culturally-appropriate Measure of Psychic Pain: Online Sampling of Mexican Adult’s Self-Experiences

María Mirón, María Elena Díaz, Ana Emilia Fortuny, Cecilia Bernadette Martínez, Luis Marcelo Cantú

Universidad de Monterrey, Mexico

Psychic pain is the experience of overwhelming negative affect, coupled with the profound sense of this emotional state being both unbearable and seemingly unsolvable, and it has been observed as an accurate predictor of suicidal attempts (Lewis, 2020). To measure it appropiately and therefore advance suicide-prevention efforts in historically under-represented populations, it is essential to validate culturally-appropriate measuring tools. In Mexican culture, topics related to psychological struggles are usually avoided, leading to lack of awareness, understanding and support for those experimenting such experiences. The present proyect represents the efforts to validate the Psychic Pain Scale (PPS) for its application in Mexican adults (aged between 18 and 30 years), and reflections on the process. The PPS was originally developed in English by Lewis, Good, Tillman and Hopwood (2020), and it’s been discovered to be a valuable measure of subjective distress associated with outcomes related to suicide and several risk factors.

The investigators of this study individually translated each item of the PPS into Spanish, prior to a consensus discussion led by an expert advisor in which various versions were discussed until reaching semantic and grammatical consensus. An independent bilingual psychologist carried out the back-translation into English of the Spanish version to assess consistency between translations. As a pilotage, a qualitative analysis was conducted using the Spanish version and administered through an online convenience-sampling to 30 participants. This pilotage involved clarifying questions prompting participants to use paraphrasing and specification to further understand their interpretations of the items and verify that they maintain their structure in the target language version. With the data obtained, an analysis using grounded theory was conducted creating categories to find patterns, for example "hopelessness", "overwhelm", as well as the translation of internal experiences and mental contents like feelings into thoughts and concrete expriences.



ID: 224
Individual Paper

Is The Learning Only In My Imagination? Social Dreaming of South African Use for Student-centred and Social Justice-orientated Leadership Learning

Neo Pule

University of Johannesburg, South Africa

Psycho-social studies, otherwise known as Socioanalytic studies in countries like Australia, is home to social dreaming work. Social dreaming is a practice involving a group gathering for the sharing of dreams to explore, understand and uncover the unconscious of a society or community. This idea creates an impression that the potential for learning is extended in depth and breadth. Still, the question can be asked “Is the learning only in my imagination?”. The dreaming space involves the aspect of reverie where thoughts flow without any ordering, prompting or direction and through a democratic space which is contrary to the traditional instruction of learning that has preconceived outcomes. Some traditional spaces question whether social dreaming practice counts as science. In this study, student leaders came together to co-construct a learning space about their student leadership by participating in social dreaming. This participation showed student-centred and social justice-orientated leadership learning that can be attributed to social dreaming. At the same time, some of the learning is difficult to account for because of the intangible value of social dreaming. A key finding about the student leader’s social dreaming experience is grounded in what they found to be a humanizing experience. The humanizing experience is embedded in contextual application and practice. In the case of this work, the contextual significance of Africa is highlighted through the use of dreams in conjunction with the use of language such as idioms, storytelling and similar practices. The use of language elevates the meaning emerging from the dreams to deepen learning and to create personal affiliations to experiences acquired during social dreaming. As such, learning or not learning from social dreaming experiences becomes an added advantage while self-led actions of student leadership showed up after sharing dreams, and these have indicated social justice outcomes.



ID: 210
Individual Paper

Collaborative Fragmentation: Psychosocial Experiments in Writing-as-Encounter

Elena Gkivisi, Clau Di Gianfrancesco

Birkbeck College, University of London, United Kingdom

The suggested contribution is a collaborative dialogical reading of Bracha Ettinger’s matrixial theory alongside queer and anti-racist autobiographical and autotheoretical practices that focus on undoing and unbecoming. Ettinger’s concept of ‘metramorphosis’ is defined as a process of change in borderlines and thresholds between being and absence, memory and oblivion, I and non-I. Throughout the re-attuning of distance(s)-in-proximity, metramorphosis creates and is constantly re-created within matrixial interlacing effects of relations-without-relating and separation-in-jointness, in-between presence and absence. The transformative quality posited by Ettinger’s matrixial theory resonates with the work of many queer, anti-racist, black feminists, theorists and writers who have similarly troubled universalistic theorisations of subjectivity grounded on colonial and cisheteropatriarchal normativity. In this paper, we investigate the points of connection, friction, and potentiality running through these theories and life-writing practices.

Additionally, by exploring our own experience of collaboration with each other and other colleagues, we explore how collaborative practices in academia may be inhabited by creative disruption and used as psychosocial research methodologies. Our hypothesis is that concepts such as undoing, unbecoming, severality, borderlinking, and fragmentation can also be used as notional compasses for the generation of new practices and methodologies of reading, writing, researching, and relating within the field of psychosocial studies.



 
Contact and Legal Notice · Contact Address:
Privacy Statement · Conference: APS 2024 - APCS 2024
Conference Software: ConfTool Pro 2.6.151
© 2001–2024 by Dr. H. Weinreich, Hamburg, Germany