Programa de actividades

Sesión
JE12: National Power and International Geoestructure
Hora:
Jueves, 17/10/2024:
17:30 - 18:50

Moderador/a: Dr. Alberto Rocha Valencia
Comentarista: Dra. Elizabeth Vargas G.
Comentarista: Dr. Héctor Cuadra Montiel
Lugar: Salón 112

Edificio de Posgrado, 1er Piso, Facultad de Contaduría y Administración, Circuito Universitario Campus ll

Análisis de Novedad Editorial


Presentaciones

National Power and International Geoestructure

Moderador/a: Dr. Alberto Rocha Valencia (Universidad de Guadalajara)

Comentarista(s): Dra. Elizabeth Vargas G. (Universidad de Guadalajara), Dr. Héctor Cuadra Montiel (Colegio de San Luis), Dr. Jorge Alberto Quevedo Flores (Universidad de Guadalajara)

Ponente(s): Dra. Elizabeth Vargas G. (Universidad de Guadalajara), Dr. Alberto Rocha Valencia (Universidad de Guadalajara)

After the Cold War and global bipolarity, since the beginning of the 1990s of the

last century, there was an acceleration of the processes of regionalization and glob

alization, then two important phenomena began to be observed regarding the distri

bution of power in the international system: on the one hand, some powers began

to experience decrease in their national–international power and, with it, in their

international projection; on the other hand, some countries (specifically the so-called

BRICS) began to emerge or, in some cases, re-emerge as powers. Consequently, some

academics returned to the concept of middle powers to address this phenomenon.

Clearly, the so-called middle or intermediate powers constituted an extremely

diverse set of nations, each with different historical trajectories and not always with

common objectives to address shared challenges. Although in specific circumstances,

such as the containment of great powers, they could come together and unite in

defense of the rights of weaker states, generally speaking, they were unable to main

tain a significant level of solidarity. This situation revealed theoretical, methodolog

ical, and conceptual issues in relation to the concept of “middle power”. Despite its

attractiveness, this concept was insufficient to explain the changes in international

reality toward the end of the 20th century and the transformations in power dynamics

in the Post-Cold War international system.